Risk management
Organization of risk management
For FMO, acting in its role as Programme manager (hereafter ‘FMO’) to be able to carry out the programme’s strategy, it is essential to have an adequate risk management system in place to identify, measure, monitor and mitigate financial and non- financial risks. MFF (hereafter ‘the programme’) has a pre-defined risk appetite translated into limits for group, customer, country, region and currencies exposures. Limit usages are monitored on a monthly basis and for each proposed transaction.
The Programme manager reviews each transaction and provides consent to eligible proposals. The Investment Committee, comprising of senior representatives of several departments, reviews financing proposals for new transactions. Each financing proposal is assessed in terms of specific counterparty, product risk as well as country risk. All financing proposals are accompanied by the advice of the Credit department. This department is responsible for credit risk assessment of both new transactions and the existing portfolio. For small exposures, Credit department has the authority to review new transactions.
In addition, financial exposures in emerging markets are subject to a periodic review, which are in general executed annually. Exposures that require specific attention are reviewed by the Investment Review Committee (IRC). The larger and higher risk exposures are accompanied by the advice of the Credit department. If the Investment Review Committee concludes that a customer has difficulty in meeting its payment obligations, the customer is transferred to the Special Operations department – responsible for the management of distressed assets – where it is intensely monitored.
Financial risk
Credit risk
Credit risk is defined as the risk that the programme will suffer economic loss because a counterparty cannot fulfil its financial or other contractual obligations arising from a financial contract. Credit risk is the main risk within the programme and occurs in two areas of its operations: (i) credit risk in investments in emerging markets and off-balance instruments such as loan commitments; and (ii) credit risk in the treasury portfolio, only consisting of bank accounts and money market instruments.
Credit Risk management is very important at FMO, both in the context of project selection and project monitoring. In this process, a set of investment criteria per sector and product is used that reflects minimum standards for the required financial strength of FMO’s customers. This is further supported by credit risk models that are used for risk quantification, calculations of expected credit loss allowance, and the determination of economic capital use per transaction. Funding decisions depend on the risk profile of the customer and financing instrument. For credit monitoring, FMO’s customer are subject to annual reviews at a minimum. FMO also monitors customers that are identified due to financial difficulties through a Watch List process to proactively manage loans before they become non-performing. For distressed assets, the Special Operations department actively manages workout and restructuring.
FMO has embarked on an overhaul of its credit risk policy and processes. The objective is to implement a more aligned and effective portfolio management framework across the organization. Implementation has started in 2021 via the Investment Risk Project, which will continue further in 2023.
Credit quality analysis
In addition to on balance loans, irrevocable facilities (off-balance) represent commitments to extend finance to customers and consist of contracts signed but not disbursed yet which are usually not immediately and fully drawn.
Maximum exposure to credit risk | ||
2022 | 2021 | |
On balance | ||
Banks | 6,671 | 5,743 |
Short-term deposits | 99,000 | 59,000 |
Loans to the private sector: | ||
- of which: at Amortized Cost | - | - |
- of which: at Fair value through profit or loss | 17,560 | - |
Other receivables | 31 | - |
Total on-balance | 123,262 | 64,743 |
Off-balance | ||
Irrevocable facilities | 18,750 | 33,250 |
Total off-balance | 18,750 | 33,250 |
Total credit risk exposure | 141,982 | 97,993 |
The following tables provide insights in the credit risk allocation of loan portfolio and loan commitments according to internal ratings.
Loan portfolio at December 31, 2022 Indicative counterparty credit rating scale of S&P | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Fair Value | Total |
F1-F10 (BBB- and higher) | - | - | - | - | - |
F11-F13 (BB-,BB,BB+) | - | - | - | 17,560 | 17,560 |
F14-F16 (B-,B,B+) | - | - | - | - | - |
F17 and lower (CCC+ and lower) | - | - | - | - | - |
Sub-total | - | - | - | 17,560 | 17,560 |
Less: amortizable fees | - | - | - | - | - |
Less: ECL allowance | - | - | - | - | - |
Plus: Fair value adjustments | - | - | - | - | - |
Carrying value | - | - | - | 17,560 | 17,560 |
Loan commitments at December 31, 2022 Indicative counterparty credit rating scale of S&P | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Other 1) | Total |
F1-F10 (BBB- and higher) | - | - | - | - | - |
F11-F13 (BB-,BB,BB+) | - | - | - | 15,750 | 15,750 |
F14-F16 (B-,B,B+) | 3,000 | - | - | - | 3,000 |
F17 and lower (CCC+ and lower) | - | - | - | - | - |
Sub-total | 3,000 | - | - | 15,750 | 18,750 |
Less: ECL allowance | -28 | - | - | - | -28 |
Carrying value | 2,972 | - | - | 15,750 | 18,722 |
Loan commitments at December 31, 2021 Indicative counterparty credit rating scale of S&P | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Other 1) | Total |
F1-F10 (BBB- and higher) | - | - | - | - | - |
F11-F13 (BB-,BB,BB+) | - | - | - | 33,250 | 33,250 |
F14-F16 (B-,B,B+) | - | - | - | - | - |
F17 and lower (CCC+ and lower) | - | - | - | - | - |
Sub-total | - | - | - | 33,250 | 33,250 |
Less: ECL allowance | - | - | - | - | - |
Carrying value | - | - | - | 33,250 | 33,250 |
- 1 Other loan commitments consist of transactions for which no ECL is calculated.
Concentration risk
Country risk
Country risk arises from country-specific events that adversely impact the Programme’s exposure in a specific country. Within FMO, country risk is broadly defined. It includes all relevant factors that have a common impact on the Programme’s portfolio in a country such as economic, banking and currency crises, sovereign default and political risk events. The assessment of the country rating is based on a benchmark of external rating agencies and other external information.
The level of the country limits depends on the sovereign rating. FMO recognizes that the impact of country risk differs across the financial products it offers.
Single and group risk exposures
In the programme risk appetite, the maximum customer exposure for MFF is set at 40% aggregated of funds.
Counterparty credit risk
Credit risk in the treasury portfolio stems from bank account holdings and placements in money market instruments to manage the liquidity in the programme. The Risk department approves each obligor to which the programme is exposed through its treasury activities and sets a maximum limit for the credit exposure of that obligor. Depending on the obligor’s short and long-term rating, limits are set for the total and long-term exposure. The programme pursues a conservative investment policy.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of not being able to fulfil the financial obligations and meet financial commitments due to insufficient availability of liquid means. The programme aims to maintain adequate liquidity buffers, enough to support the implementation of the Programme’s development agenda and impact objectives while avoiding putting pressure on UK Government subsidy budget allocated to the programme. To realize this ambition, the programme benefits from the experience of FMO’s treasury and risk management functions in managing the liquidity risk, which primarily involves periodical forecasting of the programme's liquidity position under normal and stress scenarios. During these periodical exercises, the assumptions underlying the liquidity model are reviewed and changes in expected cashflows, stemming from updated portfolio management strategies and changes in the programme's operating environment, are reflected on the said assumptions. As a result of the forecasting activity, the predicted liquidity shortfall is avoided through arrangements in investments portfolio.
Market risk
Market risk can be divided into interest rate risk and currency risk.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk of potential loss due to adverse movements in interest rates. Changing interest rates mainly have an effect on the fair value of fixed interest balance sheet items. Given the balance sheet and capital structure of the programme interest rate risks are considered limited.
Interest re-pricing characteristics | ||||
December 31, 2022 | <3 months | >5 years | Non-interest-bearing | Total |
Assets | ||||
Banks | 6,671 | - | - | 6,671 |
Short-term deposits | 99,000 | - | - | 99,000 |
Loan portfolio | - | - | - | - |
- of which: at Amortized Cost | - | - | - | - |
- of which: at Fair value through profit or loss | - | 17,560 | - | 17,560 |
Other receivables | - | - | 31 | 31 |
Total assets | 105,671 | 17,560 | 31 | 123,262 |
Liabilities and capital | ||||
Current accounts with FMO | 776 | - | - | 776 |
Accrued liabilities | - | - | 4,381 | 4,381 |
Provisions | - | - | 28 | 28 |
Other liabilities | 30 | - | - | 30 |
Fund capital | - | - | 118,047 | 118,047 |
Total liabilities and capital | 806 | - | 122,456 | 123,262 |
Interest sensitivity gap 2022 | 104,865 | 17,560 | -122,425 | |
Interest re-pricing characteristics | ||||
December 31, 2021 | <3 months | >5 years | Non-interest-bearing | Total |
Assets | ||||
Banks | 5,743 | - | - | 5,743 |
Short-term deposits | 59,000 | - | - | 59,000 |
Total assets | 64,743 | - | - | 64,743 |
Liabilities and capital | ||||
Current accounts with FMO | 475 | - | - | 475 |
Fund capital | - | - | 64,268 | 64,268 |
Total liabilities and capital | 475 | - | 64,268 | 64,743 |
Interest sensitivity gap 2021 | 65,218 | - | 64,268 |
Currency risk
Currency risk is defined as the risk of having an adverse effect on the value of the programmes' financial position and future cash flows due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The programme offers debt, equity and guarantee instruments denominated in USD, while the main source of funding to the programme, are subsidies received from UK Government in GBP converted to USD. Due to its commitment to the implementation of the programmes' development agenda and impact objectives, the programme does not exclusively look for investments that counter-balance this currency risk exposure in its portfolio; the programme also does not use derivatives and other financial instruments to hedge against the currency risk, and avoids bearing the cost of these engineered measures. The programme does not take active positions in any currency for the purpose of making a profit.
Currency risk exposure (at carrying values) | ||
December 31, 2022 | US$ | Total |
Assets | ||
Banks | 6,671 | 6,671 |
Short-term deposits | 99,000 | 99,000 |
Loan portfolio | ||
- of which: at Amortized Cost | - | - |
- of which: at Fair value through profit or loss | 17,560 | 17,560 |
Other receivables | 31 | 31 |
Total assets | 123,262 | 123,262 |
Liabilities and capital | ||
Current account with FMO | 776 | 776 |
Accrued liabilities | 4,381 | 4,381 |
Provisions | 28 | 28 |
Other liabilities | 30 | 30 |
Fund capital | 118,047 | 118,047 |
Total liabilities and capital | 123,262 | 123,262 |
Currency sensitivity gap 2022 | - | |
Currency sensitivity gap 2022 excluding equity investments | - | |
Currency risk exposure (at carrying values) | ||
December 31, 2021 | US$ | Total |
Assets | ||
Banks | 5,743 | 5,743 |
Short-term deposits | 59,000 | 59,000 |
Total assets | 64,743 | 64,743 |
Liabilities and capital | ||
Current account with FMO | 475 | 475 |
Total liabilities and capital | 475 | 475 |
Currency sensitivity gap 2021 | - | |
Currency sensitivity gap 2021 excluding equity investments | - |
Non-financial risk
Environmental, social and governance risk
Environmental & Social (E&S) risk refers to potential adverse impacts of the programmes' investments on the environment, employees, communities, or other stakeholders. Corporate Governance (G) risks refers primarily to risk to customer business. ESG risks can lead to non-compliance with applicable regulation, NGO and press attention or reputation damage. These risks stem from the nature of the programmes' projects in difficult markets, where regulations on ESG are less institutionalized.
The programme has an appetite for managed risk in portfolio, accepting ESG performance below standards when starting to work with a customer, with the goal that performance is brought in line with our ESG risk mitigation requirements within a credible and reasonable period. ESG risks are mitigated through environmental and social action plans and monitoring. The risk appetite for deviations from the exclusion list and human rights violations is zero.
As part of the investment process, all customers are screened on ESG risk and categorizes them according to the ESG risk that their activities represent. FMO assesses in detail customers with a high ESG risk category to identify ESG impact and risks and to assess the quality of existing risk management and mitigation measures. Due diligence also includes an analysis of contextual and human rights risk. In case of gaps in ESG risk management, FMO works with customers to develop and implement an Action Plan to avoid adverse ESG impacts and/or to improve ESG risk management over time. Key ESG risk items are tracked during the tenor of the engagement. FMO’s ESG risk management support to customers is an important part of development impact ambitions.
In addition, for customers with a high ESG category, FMO monitors customer performance on key ESG risk themes (against the IFC Performance Standards) using the ESG Performance Tracker (ESG-PT). The ESG-PT keeps track of key ESG risks and customer performance level, enabling FMO to have a portfolio-wide view of its ESG risks.
Compliance risk
Compliance Risk is the risk of failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory organization, standards and codes of conduct applicable to FMO’s services and activities.
Definition
FMO’s standards and policies and good business practices foster acting with integrity. FMO is committed to its employees, customers, and counterparties, adhering to high ethical standards. FMO has a compliance framework that entails identifying risks, designing policies, monitoring, training, and providing advice. FMO has policies on topics such as financial economic crime (including KYC, sanctions, anti-bribery, and corruption and transaction monitoring and unusual transaction reporting), conflicts of interest, anti-fraud, private investments, protection of personal data and speak-up.
FMO also regularly trains its employees to raise awareness through virtual classroom trainings and mandatory compliance related e-learnings. Employees are also encouraged to speak up in case of suspected integrity violations conducted by an FMO employee. Management is periodically informed via the Compliance Committee or when required on an ad-hoc basis, on integrity related matters at customer or employee level. In case of signals of violations, e.g., money laundering, fraud or corruption, Management will take appropriate actions.
The governance of compliance also entails the following key risks:
Financial Economic Crime, incl. sanctions
FMO’s financial economic crime procedures include, amongst others, screening of customers on compliance with applicable anti-money laundering, counter financing of terrorism and international sanctions laws and regulations. Due diligence is performed on customers, which includes checks such as identifying and verifying the ultimate beneficial owners of the customer we finance, identifying politically exposed persons, and screening against relevant international sanctions lists. These checks are also performed regularly during the relationship with existing customers.
There is always a risk that a customer is involved or alleged to be involved in illicit acts (e.g. money laundering, fraud or corruption). If such an event occurs, FMO will initiate a dialogue with the customer, if possible and appropriate given the circumstances, to understand the background in order to be able to assess and investigate the severity. When FMO is of the opinion that there is a breach of law that cannot be remedied or that no improvement by the customer will be achieved (e.g. awareness, implementing controls) or that the risk to FMO’s reputation is unacceptably high, FMO may be able to exercise certain remedies under the contract such as the right to cancel a loan or suspend upcoming disbursements and will report to regulatory authorities if deemed necessary.
In 2021, FMO completed its financial economic crime (FEC) enhancement project. This included an extensive Know Your Customer (KYC) file remediation, tailored to the specific requirements of developing and emerging economies. The external validation, which was overall positive, identified several recommendations that FMO has followed up in 2022. For certain compliance themes, such as anti-bribery and corruption, as well as sanctions and unusual transactions, awareness sessions (refreshers) were organized with targeted front-office departments.
We are determined to continue to improve in the regulatory domain and to ensure that the changes we implement are tailored to the day-to-day realities and complexities of the markets we are active in.
General Data Protection Act (GDPR)
In 2021, FMO started a project to further develop a data privacy framework and raise privacy awareness within the organization. The project is almost completed and has delivered several essential privacy improvements. A GDPR eLearning for all employees was rolled out to ensure the necessary knowledge within the organization. Next to that the privacy governance is strengthened in the organization by appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO). The DPO conducts privacy assessments in new projects and initiatives, gives advice on reducing privacy risks and monitors FMO's privacy compliance.
Sanctions
Several additional measures have been taken since the start of 2022 in relation to sanctions involving Russia, Belarus and Myanmar to ensure FMO’s funds are not directly or indirectly provided to sanctioned parties. These measures include, setting up of a Sanctions Working Group, increased frequency of adverse news screenings and communication with customers in the affected regions and industries. In August 2022, FMO received a request from DNB to participate in an industry-wide investigation on the effectiveness of its sanctions screening system (transaction screening and customer screening).
Operational risk
Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events, including legal risks, excluding strategic risks. Operational risks are not actively sought and have no direct material upside in terms of return/income generation, yet operational risk events are inherent in operating a business. Operational risk events can result in non-compliance with applicable (internal and external) standards, losses, misstatements in the financial reports, and reputational damage.
Overall, FMO is cautious with operational risks. Safe options, with low inherent risk are preferred, despite consequence of limited rewards (or higher costs). There is no appetite for high residual risk. Risk metrics are reported on a quarterly basis. These metrics cover operational risks in general, such as the amount of loss per quarter and timely follow-up of management actions, and specific metrics for risk-(sub)types.
Management of the first line of defense is primarily responsible for managing (embedded) risks in the day-to-day business processes. The first line acts within the risk management framework and supporting guidelines defined by specialized risk functions that make up the second line of defense. Internal Audit in its role of the third line of defense provides independent assurance on the effectiveness of the first and second lines.
Departmental risk control self-assessments are conducted annually in order to identify and assess risks and corresponding controls. The strategy and business objectives are also reviewed annually by the Directors in a risk perspective. Based on among others these Risk and Control Self Assessments, the Directors sign a departmental In Control Statement at the year-end, which provides the underpinning for the management declaration in the Annual Report. Despite all preventive measures, operational risk events will occur. FMO systematically collects risk event information and analyses such events to take appropriate actions.